Original Research Articles

Morphometric Assessment of the Clivus using Computed Tomography in Adult Nigerians Visiting a Private Health Care Facility in Delta State

Authors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66779/6xpg8y66
Abstract

Background: The management of clival pathologies requires accurate morphometric assessment of the clivus to facilitate preoperative planning and inform the design of population-specific implants. The clival index provides valuable insight into clival morphology, an important parameter in skull base surgery. Clival morphometry is also useful in the forensic identification of unknown skeletal remains. This study aimed to evaluate the dimensions of the clivus and determine their variations according to age and sex in a Nigerian population.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated clival dimensions using 230 cranial computed tomography (CT) images from 115 males and 115 females aged 20–80 years, retrieved from the radiological database of a private hospital in Delta State, Nigeria. Access to the database was granted following approval by a University's Ethics Committee. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics), version 27. The independent-samples t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare mean values between sex and age groups, respectively. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationships between variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: Clival length and width exhibited significant sexual dimorphism, with males demonstrating larger dimensions than females (p < 0.05). In contrast, age was not significantly correlated with either clival length or width. A strong positive correlation was observed between clival length and width (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: This study provides population-specific baseline morphometric data that may support preoperative planning for craniovertebral junction (CVJ) procedures and contribute to the development of clival implants and fixation devices tailored to the population of Delta State, Nigeria. The observed sexual dimorphism also suggests that clival morphometry may serve as a useful adjunct skeletal marker for forensic sex estimation.

Author Biographies
  1. Dr. Beryl Shitandi Ominde

    Department of Biomedical Sciences
    Assistant Professor

  2. Dr. Oghenetejiri Denise Ogholoh

    Department of Radiology

    Consultant Radiologist

     

  3. Miss. Sarah Isioma Sunday

    Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology

  4. Dr. Mamerhi Taniyohwo Enaohwo

    Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology

    Assistant Professor

  5. Prof. Patrick Sunday Igbigbi

    Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology

    Professor

References

1. Gupta PP, Dhok AM, Shaikh ST, Patil AS, Gupta D, Jagdhane NN. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Craniovertebral Junction in Asymptomatic Central Rural Indian Population. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020;11(3):442–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712719

2. Abdolmaleki M, Ghafari R, Pourkhalili R. Analysis of morphological and anthropometric variations of clivus using cone beam computed tomography in adults. Caspian J Dent Res [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2026 Apr 17];10(1):19–26.

3. Hedayatian M, Azarbayejani S, Omrani A, Borujeni SE. Correlation of Clivus Length and Angle with Chronological Age, Gender, Sagittal Growth Pattern of the Jaws, and Skeletal Maturation Using Lateral Cephalometry. J Dent (Shiraz). 2024;25(3):251–61.

4. Chaurasia A, Patil R, Katheriya G. Radiomorphometeric evaluation of clivus in indian paediatric population visiting a tertiary dental hospital-a cone beam computed tomography study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2018;12(2):ZC05–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/32373.11158

5. Aliyu AS, Bello R, Gudaji A, Abubakar M, Gaya AA, Zeera AM, et al. Age and Gender Variations in Clival Measurements: A Cross-Sectional Study from Federal Teaching Hospital Katsina Using CT scan. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy. 2025;22(2):338–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/jeca.v22i2.20

6. Furtado S V., Reddy K, Hegde AS. Posterior fossa morphometry in symptomatic pediatric and adult Chiari I malformation. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2009;16(11):1449–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.04.005

7. Moawad AM, Abu-Taleb NS, Hassan FM, Mahrous MM, Khalifa FN. Cone-beam Computed Tomography of the Clivus in an Egyptian Population Sample: A Forensic Perspective. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine. 2025;11(3):219–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_62_24

8. Diniz JM, Botelho R V. The role of clivus length and cranial base flexion angle in basilar invagination and Chiari malformation pathophysiology. Neurol Sci. 2020;41(7):1751–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04248-1

9. Allen PA, Loth F, Loth D, Al Samman MM, Labuda R, Herrera C, et al. Correlation of anterior CSF space in the cervical spine with Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale score in adult females. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024;42(3):299–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24370

10. Makhlouf F, Karwad M, Algezeri S. Morphological Measurements and Anatomical Variations of The Clivus Bone Using Computed Tomography in Adults, Benghazi. AlQalam Journal of Medical and Applied Sciences. 2025;471–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54361/ajmas.258166

11. Ojha S, Debnath M, Ojha S, Debnath M. Sexual Dimorphism in Clivus Morphometry: A Multi-Detector Computed Tomography Study. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU. 2025;15(3):291–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/JHS-2024-6-24-R2-(1443)

12. Ji W, Tong J, Huang Z, Zheng M, Wu X, Chen J, et al. A clivus plate fixation for reconstruction of ventral defect of the craniovertebral junction: a novel fixation device for craniovertebral instability. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(8):1658–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4025-8

13. Aljuboori Z, Alhourani A, Nuru M, Nguyen C, Yeo H, Williams B, et al. Morphometric Study of the Posterior Fossa: Identification of Practical Parameters for Tailored Selection of Surgical Routes to the Petroclival Region. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022;83(1):37–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716691

14. Batista UC, Joaquim AF, Fernandes YB, Mathias RN, Ghizoni E, Tedeschi H. Computed tomography evaluation of the normal craniocervical junction craniometry in 100 asymptomatic patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(4):1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14642

15. Kayacı S, Ozveren MF, Bas O, Ayberk G, Aslan MN, Sam B, et al. Effect of clival bone growth on the localization of the abducens nerve at the petroclival region: a postmortem anatomical study. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2021;43(6):953–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02691-z

16. ThiruKumaran, K YB. Morphometric Analysis of Intracranial Clivus in South Indian Skulls. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2020;0(0):147–9.

17. Pandey S, Singh S, Gupta N, Nagar A, Arti A, Arya S, et al. Extracranial clivus morphometry in Indian skulls: A study for optimizing surgical safety. Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences. 2025;15(1):47–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/jmas.216610

18. Nwotchouang BST, Eppelheimer MS, Bishop P, Biswas D, Andronowski JM, Bapuraj JR, et al. Three-Dimensional CT Morphometric Image Analysis of the Clivus and Sphenoid Sinus in Chiari Malformation Type I. Ann Biomed Eng. 2019;47(11):2284–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02301-5

19. Serindere G, Gunduz K, Avsever H. Morphological Measurement and Anatomical Variations of the Clivus Using Computed Tomography. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jul 10;83(Suppl 2):E75–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722712

20. Shuman WH, DiRisio A, Carrasquilla A, Lamb CD, Quinones A, Pionteck A, et al. Is there a morphometric cause of Chiari malformation type I? Analysis of existing literature. Neurosurg Rev. 2022;45(1):263–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01592-4

21. Shalini K, Katne T, Gotoor S, Gantala R, Kanaparthi A, Parthasarathy N. Radiomorphometric analysis of the clivus – A soothsayer of age and gender. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. 2022;10(3):69–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jomr.jomr_8_22

22. Belgin CA, Bayrak S, Orhan K, Ankarali H. Multiple Regression Modeling for Age Estimation by Assessment and Comparison of Spheno-Occipital Synchondrosis Fusion and Cervical Vertebral Maturation Stages. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021;83(3):285–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722277

23. Yilmaz N, Secgin Y, Atay I, Keskin N. Gender estimation using machine learning algorithms from computed tomography images of clivus. Medicine Science | International Medical Journal. 2024;13(3):541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2024.05.046

24. Ominde BS, Enaohwo MT, Ogholo OD, Ikubor JE, Onogbe PO, Jeremiah O. Evaluation of the Evan’s Index on Normal Brain Computed Tomography Scans of Adults in Delta State Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2025;32(1):47–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_289_24

25. Ominde BS, Igbigbi PS. Morphometry of the Occipital Condyles in Adult Nigerians. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences. 2022;20(4):10

26. Ominde BS, Igbigbi PS. A retrospective study to evaluate the morphometry of the foramen magnum and its role in forensic science in a nigerian population of Delta State. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine. 2022;8(2):46–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_41_21

27. Ominde BS, Igabari JN, Ikubor JE. Morphometric Study of the Mastoid Process and its Role in Sex Differentiation: A Nigerian Computed Tomography Study. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine. 2024;10(1):1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_7_23

28. Chaurasia A, Katheriya G, Patil R, Professor A. Radio-morphometric evaluation of Clivus in Indian ethinicity-A cone beam computed tomography study. Journal of Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2017;3(1):35–41.

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
10-07-2026
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Advancing Translational Biomedical Research through Innovation, and Clinical Discovery
Section
Original Research Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Emerging Frontiers in Translational Biomedicine and Health Sciences

All content published in Emerging Frontiers in Translational Biomedicine and Health Sciences (EFTBHS) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as they:

  1. Give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal.

  2. Provide a link to the license.

  3. Indicate if changes were made.

  4. Distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.

Under this license, users may not use the material for commercial purposes.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Authors may enter into separate, non-exclusive agreements for non-commercial distribution (e.g., in institutional repositories or course materials) with acknowledgment of the initial publication in EFTBHS.

For details, visit the official Creative Commons page:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Summary of permissions under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.

  • Attribution required — must credit author(s) and journal.

  • NonCommercial — no commercial use permitted.

  • ShareAlike — derivative works must use the same license.